Tag Archives: Conservative

biden creates disinformation board to police the internet

Conservatives on social media slammed the Biden administration after it was announced that a “Disinformation Governance Board” is being established to combat “disinformation” in the 2022 midterms.

Homeland Security Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas testified Wednesday that a Disinformation Governance Board had recently been created, days after Tesla CEO Elon Musk purchased Twitter, to combat online disinformation and will be led by Undersecretary for Policy Rob Silvers and principal deputy general counsel Jennifer Gaskill.

“The goal is to bring the resources of (DHS) together to address this threat,” Mayorkas said, adding that the department is focused on the spread of disinformation in minority communities.

Read More:  Fox News

Majority of Conservative Students Self-Censor

In a poll of students it has been found that 54% of conservative students will self-censor their beliefs. This is in order not to offend their liberal peers. This contrasts with only 15% of democrat students who say they would self-censor.

“Beyond disciplinary proceedings, students also credibly fear their peers, who are increasingly intolerant of differing viewpoints,” said Nicole Neily, the president of the First Amendment advocacy group Speech First.

“Rather than leverage the tools of discussion, debate, and persuasion, students now seem inclined to strong-arm their peers into compliance through canceling and doxxing — allegations that last forever on the internet, and have the very real possibility of ruining someone’s future professional opportunities.”

Read More: Breitbart

CONSERVATIVES SURPRISE WIN IN UK ELECTIONS

In the UK elections, the Conservatives led by David Cameron, were elected by a landslide victory with a clear majority in the House of Commons.

The result was unseen by exit polls and journalists alike, who had predicted a close race between Labour and the ruling Conservatives. All media talk prior to election day was about coalition government, though neither main party would be drawn on who they would work closely with, in the event of a hung parliament.

Casualties of the day turned out to be the Labour Party especially in Scotland, the Liberal Democrats and UKIP (the UK Independence Party), who all suffered major loses.  The Scottish National Party (SNP), who recently lost but did well in the Scottish referendum last September, gained all the Scottish seats except 3, to form the 3rd largest party in the UK parliament.

Leaders Ed Miliband (Labour) and Nick Clegg (Liberal Democrats) immediately resigned as a result of the election night results and new leaders will be elected shortly.  Meanwhile, David Cameron (Conservative) continues to run the country, unopposed, for a further five years.

READ MORE……

Crime rates in liberal cities shockingly higher than in conservative cities

The (San Francisco) Bay Area Center For Voting Research itemized highly conservative and highly liberal cities nationwide.  This was done by how they voted, either republican or liberal in the 2004 presidential election.

Also, votes for the Libertarian and Constitution Parties were considered conservative.  Votes for the Green, Peace and Freedom Parties were counted as liberal.

The top 15 cities of each are listed below… with their violent crime rates.  Note, the national average is 4 violent crimes per 1000 residents.

Top Liberal:

Detroit, Michigan – 24 violent crimes per 1,000 residents

Gary, Indiana – 15 violent crimes per 1,000 residents

Berkeley, California – 5 violent crimes per 1,000 residents

Washington, DC – 13 violent crimes per 1,000 residents

Oakland, California – 16 violent crimes per 1,000 residents

Inglewood, California – 8 violent crimes per 1,000 residents

Newark, New Jersey – 11 violent crimes per 1,000 residents

Cambridge, Massachusetts – 5 violent crimes per 1,000 residents

San Francisco, California – 7 violent crimes per 1,000 residents

Flint, Michigan – 24 violent crimes per 1,000 residents

Cleveland, Ohio – 14 violent crimes per 1,000 residents

Hartford, Connecticut – 13 violent crimes per 1,000 residents

Paterson, New Jersey – 11 violent crimes per 1,000 residents

Baltimore, Maryland – 15 violent crimes per 1,000 residents

New Haven, Connecticut – 15 violent crimes per 1,000 residents

Top Conservative:

Provo, Utah – 2 violent crimes per 1,000 residents

Lubbock, Texas – 9 violent crimes per 1,000 residents

Abilene, Texas – 5 violent crimes per 1,000 residents

Hialeah, Florida – 4 violent crimes per 1,000 residents

Plano, Texas – 2 violent crimes per 1,000 residents

Colorado Springs, Colorado – 5 violent crimes per 1,000 residents

Gilbert, Arizona – 1 violent crime per 1,000 residents

Bakersfield, California – 6 violent crimes per 1,000 residents

Lafayette, Louisiana – 8 violent crimes per 1,000 residents

Orange, California – 1 violent crime per 1,000 residents

Escondido, California – 4 violent crimes per 1,000 residents

Allentown, Pennsylvania – 6 violent crimes per 1,000 residents

Mesa, Arizona – 4 violent crimes per 1,000 residents

Arlington, Texas – 5 violent crimes per 1,000 residents

Peoria, Arizona – 2 violent crimes per 1,000 residents

To gain understanding of this amazing coincidence see prophet.tv.  Also see the Building the Warrior Teaching Series or this specific teaching.

Source article Crime rates in liberal cities shockingly higher than in conservative cities – Orlando Political Buzz | Examiner.com.

Greeks Withdraw $1 Billion a Day Ahead of Vote

Reuters | June 13, 2012 | 07:01 AM EDT

Greeks pulled their cash out of the banks and stocked up with food ahead of a cliffhanger election on Sunday that many fear will result in the country being forced out of the euro.

Bankers said up to 800 million euros ($1 billion) were leaving major banks daily and retailers said some of the money was being used to buy pasta and canned goods, as fears of returning to the drachma were fanned by rumors that a radical leftist leader may win the election.

The last published opinion polls showed the conservative New Democracy party, which backs the 130 billion euro ($160 billion) bailout that is keeping Greece afloat, running neck and neck with the leftist Syriza party, which wants to cancel the rescue deal.

As the election approaches, publishing polls is now legally banned and in the ensuing information vacuum, party officials have been leaking contradictory “secret polls”.

On Tuesday, one rumor making the rounds was that Syriza was leading by a wide margin.

“This is nonsense,” one reputable Greek pollster said on condition of anonymity. “Our polls show the picture has not changed much since the last polls were published. Parties may be leaking these numbers on purpose to boost their standing.”

via CNBC

CAIDEN COWGER PROGRAM, CONSERVATIVE TEEN RADIO SHOW


Caiden Cowger is a 14 year oldwith his own internet radio show. In a recent broadcast he said “Obama is making kids gay”. His show has now been removed from two internet radio hosting sites, under “hate-speech” rules.

In the program Cowger tells how he believes homosexuality is  “perverted” and that the it is becoming increasingly hard to tell other teenagers the gospel, if they are gay. He tells about a boy in his school who claims he has bullied after a girl witnessed to him. The boy’s mother, Rhonda Mangus, (she is a former gay news feature editor for Now Public Media) led the campaign to have Cowger’s program removed from Speaker internet radio.  She claimed the program breached the terms of usage policy, which state: “unlawful, defamatory, libellous, slanderous, threatening, pornographic, obscene, vulgar, harassing, harmful, hateful, abusive, racially or ethnically offensive or is otherwise inappropriate.”

There has been some confusion over Cowger’s youtube video of the program. Some saying that YouTube removed the program under it’s hate-speech policies. However, Cowger dismisses this, saying his account was hacked and he has had to set up a new YouTube channel.

However, listening to Cowger’s program he merely states his opinion. His comments may upset and offend a lot of people. But states he is against “gay bullying”, and at no point does he endorse abuse against homosexual teens. The problem with the usage policy is it is subjective. What is offensive to one person, is not to another; what one person deems “inappropriate” is different from anthers. The Bible, the Koran, is offensive to some people. Are we going to ban the Bible, for fear of offending?

What should be of greater concern, than a 14 year old boy saying he thinks “Obama is making kids gay”. Is that the liberal left media is trying to shut him down. Right or wrong what about free speech?