Tag Archives: freedom

UN Approves Russia and China Backed Internet Convention

Russia, with the backing of China, has had a resolution passed to see the establishment of a panel to look at the use of the internet for illegal purposes. The panel will work to set up “a comprehensive international convention on countering the use of information and communications technologies for criminal purposes,” the resolution said.

However the US, Europe and other western nations fear the purpose of any restrictions would be to limit freedom of speech.

“It is precisely our fear that (a new convention) would allow the codification at an international and global level of these types of controls that’s driving our opposition and our concerns about this resolution,” a US official said.

Human Rights Watch called the UN resolution’s list of sponsors “a rogue’s gallery of some of the earth’s most repressive governments.”

The countries who have backed the resolution have a history of repression of free speech, and actively try to restrict their citizens access to the internet. China for example blocks internet searches they deem harmful to their regime. India cut off the internet to muslim-majority Kashmir earlier this year; and Iran took most of their nation off-line for a time amid protests.

Read More: Breitbart

Crime rates in liberal cities shockingly higher than in conservative cities

The (San Francisco) Bay Area Center For Voting Research itemized highly conservative and highly liberal cities nationwide.  This was done by how they voted, either republican or liberal in the 2004 presidential election.

Also, votes for the Libertarian and Constitution Parties were considered conservative.  Votes for the Green, Peace and Freedom Parties were counted as liberal.

The top 15 cities of each are listed below… with their violent crime rates.  Note, the national average is 4 violent crimes per 1000 residents.

Top Liberal:

Detroit, Michigan – 24 violent crimes per 1,000 residents

Gary, Indiana – 15 violent crimes per 1,000 residents

Berkeley, California – 5 violent crimes per 1,000 residents

Washington, DC – 13 violent crimes per 1,000 residents

Oakland, California – 16 violent crimes per 1,000 residents

Inglewood, California – 8 violent crimes per 1,000 residents

Newark, New Jersey – 11 violent crimes per 1,000 residents

Cambridge, Massachusetts – 5 violent crimes per 1,000 residents

San Francisco, California – 7 violent crimes per 1,000 residents

Flint, Michigan – 24 violent crimes per 1,000 residents

Cleveland, Ohio – 14 violent crimes per 1,000 residents

Hartford, Connecticut – 13 violent crimes per 1,000 residents

Paterson, New Jersey – 11 violent crimes per 1,000 residents

Baltimore, Maryland – 15 violent crimes per 1,000 residents

New Haven, Connecticut – 15 violent crimes per 1,000 residents

Top Conservative:

Provo, Utah – 2 violent crimes per 1,000 residents

Lubbock, Texas – 9 violent crimes per 1,000 residents

Abilene, Texas – 5 violent crimes per 1,000 residents

Hialeah, Florida – 4 violent crimes per 1,000 residents

Plano, Texas – 2 violent crimes per 1,000 residents

Colorado Springs, Colorado – 5 violent crimes per 1,000 residents

Gilbert, Arizona – 1 violent crime per 1,000 residents

Bakersfield, California – 6 violent crimes per 1,000 residents

Lafayette, Louisiana – 8 violent crimes per 1,000 residents

Orange, California – 1 violent crime per 1,000 residents

Escondido, California – 4 violent crimes per 1,000 residents

Allentown, Pennsylvania – 6 violent crimes per 1,000 residents

Mesa, Arizona – 4 violent crimes per 1,000 residents

Arlington, Texas – 5 violent crimes per 1,000 residents

Peoria, Arizona – 2 violent crimes per 1,000 residents

To gain understanding of this amazing coincidence see prophet.tv.  Also see the Building the Warrior Teaching Series or this specific teaching.

Source article Crime rates in liberal cities shockingly higher than in conservative cities – Orlando Political Buzz | Examiner.com.

Google’s New Privacy Policy

March 1st has seen the launching of Google’s new privacy policy. The policy is aimed at consolidating the privacy policies for all their services, around 70 in all into one much simpler agreement. Regulators have wanted Google to simplify their privacy policies for a along time. However, the new policy is concerning a number of people in the US as well as in Europe.

The new GOOGLE policy links the information stored about a person, from all the google platforms into one profile. So if you have a gmail account, a blogger account and a youtube account, for example, google will store all the information about you from these different services together, regardless of how you use them.

The French internet regulatory body CNIL and EU data  authorities believes the move breaches EU data protection laws. Furthermore a coalition of agencies from Europe and America have written the the chief executive of Google urging him to delay the changes, Trans Atlantic Consumer Dialogue (TACD) have said, “This move has been widely criticized by US lawmakers, US Attorneys General, European lawmakers, European privacy officials, technical experts, and privacy organisations”.

Currently Google and other organisation harvest user data and store them on their servers. Google has logged every search ever conducted by their users. This information is highly valuable commercially. By building a profile up of their users using all the available data they will know you intimately. Do we really want corporations having access to that level of data about us?

Senate Bill 1867: National Defence Authorization Act

Since 9/11 homeland security has been at the top of the political agenda. The threat from Al Qaeda and affiliated groups remains high; and clearly, America’s enemies are not necessarily living in some far off land, but on her very soil. The threat from home grown terrorists is very real.

Consequently the recently passed Bill 1867 National Defence Authorization Act, has integrated national security with homeland security. On the face of things this may appear a good idea, if it keeps America safe. However, the bill has caused widespread alarm due to it’s wider implications.

S 1867 now defines American soil as part of “the battlefield”, and American citizens deemed to be “at war” with America can be detained without charge or trial. The protection offered citizens under the Constitution therefore will be removed.

The language of the bill is so vague it could be open to abuse, and could be used against US citizens; in a worst case scenario paving the way for internment camps.

Such legislation has the appearance of wisdom, but will do very little to protect against the types of terrorist attacks we have seen. What protects a region against destruction is the Presence of God, exposing wickedness, and renewing the minds of those who seek to perpetrate such crimes.

It was Prophet TV bringing the mantle into New York which stopped the Times Square bomb in May 2010. It was Prophet TV establishing an International Church Of The Gates (ICOTG) in Manhattan New York, which brought about the miracle on the Hudson, when a passenger plane landed on the icy Hudson River with no casualties. Scientifically, that plane ought to have crashed resulting in disaster, so this truly was a miracle. However, it is always God’s desire to save.

Such legislation as S 1867 only removes freedom, and could be used to oppress; only the Presence of God truly protects. Partner with Prophet TV, and partake of the mantle on this ministry.