The beginning of Obama’s biography “Dreams of My Father”, clearly states that some of the people featured are a composite of different people, and the dog eating revelation was already in the public domain.
So what’s the point of all this? There’s no story here, ….or is there?
The point is WHY, as Obama’s first term in office ends and he seeks re-election, are these issues about his past being discussed?
When Sarah Palin ran for Vice President, every stone was unturned, and her private life was studied in microscopic detail. The media reported everything they could find about Palin. Evidently large parts of the media have never read Obama’s first biography, or these issues would have been questioned sooner. And they certainly failed to research his past in any great detail.
As Andrew Breitbart pointed out before his recent sudden death, the liberal media failed to vet Obama properly. These trivial revelations are of no real importance, but questions do need to be answered.
Who were Obama’s acquaintances at college?
Who formed and influenced his political ideologies?
Friends from the far right?
How connected was Obama to communist hardliners in Chicago?
Would the media let a Republican candidate off the hook as lightly?
The media informs the opinions of this nation, and therefore, is a powerful influence over the people, that is why Prophet TV establishes churches in key media regions, to break the spirit over these places, which influence the thoughts of the those programming America.Via The Telegraph